Sunday, September 27, 2009

Paranormal State of the Union

It was a dark, damp, and misty September evening. A chill was in the air, signalling the end of summer and the start of something new. The stage was set for some freaky sh*t to go down...














Paranormal Activity is a documentary-style film about a young couple who experience strange happenings in their two-story San Diego home.
I, like many others, heard about this little film through online buzz and word of mouth. As soon as I caught a glimpse of the effectively original trailer, I HAD to see it!
Sadly, Paranormal Activity is only playing in select theaters on minimal dates and is only showing at one time slot per night (at my location). A broader release in in talks.


9/26/09
Durham, NC...

I was fortunate enough to snag a seat in the packed auditorium at The Streets at Southpoint at 11:59pm this Saturday night, for the film's opening weekend. TIP: arriving at the theater one minute before showtime guarantees slim pickings for seat choice. My seat just happened to be in the 2nd row from the front...lame. I was mortified at first, not by the film but because of my vantage point, so close to the screen. Would I lose any quality and feel too detached from the action to fully enjoy the film? Would the scares play?? No worries, they did. Oh yes, they played. My closeness to the screen only added to the claustrophobia induced by the film.

Even though the film is shot as a documentary, via handheld camera, there was little-to-no shaky or jolted camera work (not at all like the novices responsible for my "Cloverfield migraine"). 90% of the scares in Paranormal Activity occur while the main characters are sleeping, with the camera firmly planted on a tri-pod, leaving nothing unseen or blurred.
Not relying on special effects for substance, the movie has subtle scares throughout. I find these subtleties even more disturbing than an obviously fake CGI based specter (sorry Casper). The few, seemingly simple, special effects used in Paranormal Activity are so well done, it will prompt you to question if what you're seeing is actually real or not.
The lighting is also well done for this genre. Things are dark and mysterious without being too dark and without relying on the annoying green tint of night vision.
I enjoyed the two actors playing the boyfriend and girlfriend and found their performances genuine and effective. The innocence and playfulness of a young couple newly moved-in with one another adds a healthy dose of comedy and quirkiness to a story strictly marketed as a "scare-you-to-death" horror flick.
Sitting in my second row seat, eagerly wanting to be scared sh*tless, I do have to say some of the hype for this film was slightly blown out of proportion. The audience shown in the trailer for the film, for example, was a bit more startled and enthusiastic then the crowd in Durham Saturday night. Maybe that's just Hollywood for you.
The true scares did not surface until at least halfway through the movie with the first half serving as an introduction to the characters and a build-up to bigger and badder, beyond the grave, happenings. At times I found myself tapping my foot in anticipation, waiting to be jolted out of my seat. I do have to say, the initial character set-up and foreshadowing plays well for the film, thus establishing a close connection with the characters and with their unique situation.
Without giving away any juicy details, I must say that the director's use of sound as a scare tactic was quite effective. As with any (good) horror movie, it's all about the anticipation and build-up to the climactic scare. Having a loud rock-based soundtrack or constant screaming and chainsaw noise just isn't scary anymore. Paranormal Activity, devoid of any soundtrack whatsoever, makes silence its sonata.
This movie is being compared to 1999's "The Blair Witch Project" but they're really nothing alike. Except for the fact that both movies are so-called documentaries and both are sleeper hits, the mood of the two movies is quite different. In "The Blair Witch Project", the characters experience the same claustrophobia as the characters in Paranormal Activity but in a different sense. Being trapped in the woods, constantly on the run from an evil that just happens to bump into the characters every now and then is a lot different than having all of the terror centralized in one room of your house with nowhere to run.
Paranormal Activity may appear to borrow aspects of other successful horror films such as "The Blair Witch Project" "The Haunting" and "The Ring" but director Oren Peli masterfully organizes these particular thematic elements and tricks in an original and honestly frightening way. The last scene WILL give you nightmares.

With a solid 90% on Rottentomatoes and an 8.9/10 on IMDb, this is a scary movie that wont disappoint (unlike 95% of all horror movies coming out of Hollywood these days). If you happen to live in one of the selected cities go see it now...but not by yourself!
If Paranormal Activity is not playing in a nearby town, you can demand it for your city at http://www.paranormalactivity-movie.com/

919 Consensus: More laughs than screams but with certain scenes of sheer terror.

***Relationship Advice: Make sure your girlfriend does not have any pre-existing relationships with ghosts, spirits, or demons prior to moving in together!

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

"Blood Eeek"

So, I had the unfortunate experience of seeing "Blood Creek" at my local dollar theater today.
Ooof, aye dios mio!

When I originally IMDb'd this flick, it brought up an intriguing synopsis about an interesting 2006 film from Canada:

"According to a popular magazine, the 58th spookiest place in the world is the Ashbrooke Barn in the small town known as Blood Creek. Local legend states that if you perform a specific ritual in the barn and the old house up the road, you'll see visions of Zeke Ashbrooke, a farmer who went mad and hung himself, his wife and children. Rumour has it that Zeke's wife - now known as The Dark Lady - still roams the woods of Blood Creek. This summer five young campers will venture to Blood Creek and accept a dare that could cost them their lives." (IMDb.com)

BUT...

The film I actually saw is titled "Town Creek"on IMDb; a Joel Schumacher directed clone of Batman & Robin on the crap-o-meter.

This is what IMDb says about "Town Creek" aka "Blood Creek":

"A man and his brother on a mission of revenge become trapped in a harrowing occult experiment dating back to the Third Reich." (IMDb.com)

Do you seriously think I'd sit through a movie with such a synopsis???

What angers me even more is that the IMDb rating for this film is 8.6/10! WTF SERIOUSLY!? (This is why I prefer RottenTomatoes.com over IMdb ratings)

This film can be summarized in two words..."NAZI" and "ZOMBIE"...and oh yea... "CRAP".
That makes three.

You'd think a film involving Nazi zombie's and gratuitous gore would be amazing...but no. Not when you take it as serious as H1N1.

This film stars Dominic Purcell from "Prison Break", Henry Cavill... who might as well be a Josh Duhammel bastard clone, and Michael Fassbender...who you might recognise from another Nazi-based film this summer, Inglorious Basterds.

Yes folks it's official, Michael Fassbender is the go-to-guy for Nazi Gestapo, alive or undead.

If only Schumacher had the insight to take the film into the realm of farce. The film would've been ingenious! Think "Shaun of the Dead" but with NAZIS!
I mean, what do people hate more than Zombies and Nazis?? NOTHING!
Just add Ricky Gervais and you've got comic (and box office) gold!

But alas... we're stuck with a boring, laughable, zombie, Schindler's List.

To quote ENCE1981, a loyal IMDb member: "The concept is so insane, so bereft of screaming teenagers, so utterly lacking in irony despite the absolute insanity splashed upon the screen, it's bound to turn a lot of viewers off. To make matters worse, a tedious black and white prologue complete with unnecessary voice-over stains the beginning of the film, hinting too much at the later goings-on when it would have been more fun to learn the truth as the film surges forward."

The prologue WAS rediculous. Shot entirely in B&W and about 30 minutes too long (granted, it was only 32 minutes in length). The first 2 minutes were promising but then... to quote a popular musical: "Nothing kills a show more than too much exposition".

I kept waiting for the film to live up to its potential, in my mind, but eventually it ended up like an episode of "Prison Break" which unfortunatly had dropped the soap.

-RD